Parlikov, Valeriy2026-11-132026-11-1320262815-4134https://doi.uni-plovdiv.bg/handle/store/1139The normality of communication/communion is not the thing-said, but the procedure-ness of its becoming something (applicable to an inhabited world, it is pronounced as such by its self-emerging community). It seems that the norm of normality covers some essential flaw in meaningfulness, keeping it /still/ becoming – it does not examine the doing (from which the our actuality will spring), but orders the situationality that would be suitable for it, thus prohibiting the infinitude of the becoming and taking responsibility for the state of things as if they were our world. Thus, the correct doing will be such, if it takes into account and respects the possibility of an agreement on something else, the other, which, however, is the acting exclusively within the parameters that generally make sense of the otherness as available for communication, and frames it through the intelligibility of what is said. We communicate what we understand, as we understand its case and we agree not on actions, but on their intelligibility in our communication/communion. The preceding implicitly says that we have no obligation to understand the same thing in the communicated common, insofar as the dispositions of understandings are precisely the resource of communication/communion (not correctness, which is an automatically given by the case and already normalized by its pronouncement). Thus, communication/communion is not simply a belonging to coexistence, but codifies it (adds sense to it).encommuniongrammatical correctnesshabitabilitymeaningArticle