Parlikov, Valeriy2024-09-172024-09-1720242815-4134https://doi.uni-plovdiv.bg/handle/store/218For purpose of this exposition еxistence is defined as experiencing a monadic incarceration. Excessive behaviour reveals the illusory nature of its parameters, as it unlocks for the existence the variability of becoming. Thus, turning the act of existence into a paradox upgrades any meaningful alternative to simultaneity and because of this spill of linguistic fields into a state of indiscriminateness (where it purportedly happened), brings along the inarticulateness of the becoming (insofar as in any way it becomes in simultaneity) and ultimately also brings along a rejection of trustworthiness (towards the meaningfulness of being in communion) that validates communion itself. The excessive outburst is experienced as a traumatic destructiveness, insofar as it is a breakdown of the credibility of self-identity, its descent into an eroded togetherness and being thrown into freedom without the limit of living the me (in the too real-me, I am anyone and everyone). Therefore, the case of training in emotional outburst is not simulating life (spectacle in its traditional perception as something done), but as vital becoming and is a media (simulative) construct only in the presence of witnesses with a contextual definition of being together (and not in whole now-happening). The training of the outburst is demonstrative of the deliberateness of the protocols through which empathy is self-produced through its use to introduce trust in communication towards the futility of being in communion (if togetherness has the power of institution of the self-evident).otherunfoldingtrustworthinesscommunionsubjectexistenceArticle