POISONOUS BOOKS

dc.contributor.authorFreise, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-01T07:33:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01T07:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBooks can be poisonous in a literal, metaphorical, metonymical or symbolic sense. Literally, for protection; metonymically, in fiction, for killing; metaphorically, in metalepsis, as revealing reality as being fictitious; symbolically, as a danger to readers. The article examines examples of all four possibilities. Often metaphor, metonymy and symbols are used to convey a metapoetic message about the relationship between fiction and reality, about the political, social or psychological power of literature, about literature as temptation or a narcotic, or about the ambivalence of a literary message, and thus fundamentally different modes of reading. In particular, the article argues that David Damrosch’s reading in What is World Literature? of Pavić’s Dictionary of the Khazars, which he declares to be poisoned by Serbian nationalism, is subverted by the book itself which differentiates a poisonous from a non-poisonous copy of itself, meaning alternative modes of reading.
dc.identifier.issn3033-0599
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.uni-plovdiv.bg/handle/store/191
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPlovdiv University Press "Paisii Hilendarski"
dc.subjectforbidden books
dc.subjectMilorad Pavić
dc.subjectArabian Nights
dc.subjectAdam Mickiewicz
dc.subjectWalter Moers
dc.subjectZoran Živković
dc.subjectUmberto Eco
dc.titlePOISONOUS BOOKS
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
linc20242386.pdf
Size:
483.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
73 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: